Salvation Is My Name

(Source: ForGIFs.com)

(Source: minmo)

(Source: morgmir)

fit-and-healthy-for-tomorrow:

Making this rebloggable because anons be cray.

fonesecks:

crystalzelda:

ameliaelizabeth:

TIME’s new cover makes me so mad I could write essays about it, but instead I’m going to keep job hunting since in today’s world a university degree means nothing and therefore like much of my generation, I’m stuck choosing between minimum wage jobs and internships that I can’t afford to accept in an attempt to pay off my tens of thousands of dollars worth of student debt.

I’d be interested in reading this article to see exactly what makes us entitled and lazy. Are we lazy because more of us are completing high school and going to college than ever before? Are we entitled because our standard of living is declining? Do we live with our parents because we’re too slothful to leave or is because our education costs are getting steeper and steeper while we’re getting less and less aid?

Tell us, Time Magazine, about how we’re narcissistic little slugs when we’re faced with an economic crisis that resulted in a lowering of our standard of living, an increase in tuition costs and how when we get out of our very expensive schools, more and more of us are going to end up working minimum wage jobs. 

Preach.

So judging books by their cover is a horrible travesty but judging a magazine by it’s cover is cool? Because what I’m seeing here is a bunch of people reading one fucking sentence and then deciding what they want the article to say so they can be outraged about it and have another thing to bitch about. 

To me if you’re going to tear down an article from one of the most respected magazines out there, starting that tearing down with the words “I’d be interested in reading this article…” make you a colossal fucking dumbass and reaffirms whatever you imagine the article says.

Maybe those statements don’t apply to you specifically but give Time Fucking Magazine some credit here. It seems pretty narcissistic to read the god damn cover of a respected magazine, assume you know what the article says without reading it, and then refuting it’s imaginary points. while blatantly admitting you don’t know jack shit about what the argument they’re making actually is.